If 82mm-threaded lenses are in your future (my Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L II and 16-35mm f/2.8 L II use 82mm filters), then step up from 67mm to 82mm, and use 82mm filters. More Information top. Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations More. Sigma's page on their 35/1.4. Help me help you top At 24mm I can confidently shoot at 1/20th of a second and achieve desirable results (though 1/30th or more would be better), including potential motion blur of faster moving objects. Build. The Canon 24mm f/1.4 L II is stout and sturdy. It feels like it's built like a tank. Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM Handling and Features. The Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 L II USM lens is quite a substantial 760g in weight. It is weather sealed, being resistant to dust and moisture. There is Last month, portrait photographer Anita Sadowska conducted a lens shootout pitting the Canon 35mm F/1.4 vs the Sigma 35mm F/1.4 vs the Tamron 35mm F/1.4. The comparison test went down to the wire with the Tamron doing well considering its affordable price and the Canon succeeding for overall image quality. 35mm f2 IS focuses faster - very very slightly, but it does. 35mm f2 is smaller / lighter – but more plastic feeling. Wide open sharpness is about the same – both are more than sharp enough wide open as long as focus is nailed (more critical on the 1.4 for obvious reasons) 35L vignettes LESS than 35mm 2.0. Canon's EF 35mm f/1.4 USM L costs around £1120 and sports a silent focusing motor and professional grade weather resistant build quality, as well as a bright maximum aperture of f/1.4. Those in Macro. With a magnification ratio of 1:5.9 (0.17x), the 24mm ƒ/1.4L II is not a great choice for macro work. Its minimum close-focus distance is just under 10 inches (25cm), and the manual does .

canon 35mm 1.4 ii review